Fault ride-through (FRT) studies
Fault ride-through is the rule that a plant stays connected and supports the grid through a voltage dip. We show in EMT that your plant rides through the required voltage-time profile and injects reactive current the way the code asks.
When you need it.
- The grid code asks for proof of low-voltage, and often high-voltage, ride-through.
- The plant is converter-based, so ride-through depends on control settings.
- Protection or control settings changed and compliance needs confirming again.
- Behaviour during a real event has to be squared with the compliance file.
How we run it.
- 01
Define
Take the ride-through profile and current rules from the grid code.
- 02
Apply
Apply the specified fault types and durations at the connection point.
- 03
Check
Check voltage recovery, fast fault current, timing and staying connected.
- 04
Edges
Test the edges: deepest dip, longest fault, weakest grid.
- 05
Record
Pass or fail against each criterion, with annotated waveforms.
Every scenario through every study.
- PSCADFault simulation
- Vendor control modelsIBR and HVDC
- PowerFactory · PSS®ERMS screening
Weak grid · Voltage recoveryOn the weak grid the voltage recovered slowly and crossed the curve at 1.8 s. A retuned voltage loop clears it.Unbalanced faults · Reactive currentNegative-sequence current was below the requirement in unbalanced faults. A setting change brought it in.Long clearing times · Power recoveryAfter a 250 ms fault, power took 600 ms to recover. A faster ramp brings it under 500 ms.Weak grid · Repeated faultsThree faults in a minute used up the chopper’s energy rating. The design now has margin for them.
What you get.
- ReportFRT compliance report mapped to each grid-code clause
- WaveformsAnnotated voltage and current waveforms for every case
- SettingsThe control settings used, and anything they depend on
- ModelValidated model files behind the result
How we check it
Results map clause by clause to the code's acceptance criteria, and we name the worst-case scenarios rather than one nominal run. Assumptions and settings are written down for independent review.
Related case studies.
Questions engineers ask.
Is FRT the same as fast fault-current injection?
Why test the weakest grid case?
Do FRT settings interact with stability?
Have a study like this coming up?
Related: Consultancy hub · 40 MW battery case study · EMT & grid-code compliance · SSO / impedance studies