01 Core practice

Power systems consultancy for studies that don't fit a template.

Velon supports TSOs, DNOs, developers, OEMs and manufacturers across the full project lifecycle — PSCAD consultancy, EMT and PowerFactory studies, feasibility, grid-connection design, grid-code compliance and post-fault root-cause analysis — for converter-dominated networks, BESS, HVDC, data centres and large loads in the UK and internationally.

PSCAD / EMTDCDIgSILENT PowerFactoryPSS®EPythonIBR · HVDC · BESSGrid Code
What we study

The studies we specialise in.

Select a practice to see the engineering question it answers and the result we deliver. Toggle each figure to compare the as-found case against the validated fix.

Where phasor tools stop being trustworthy.

Electromagnetic-transient studies and PSCAD models for converter-dominated networks — IBR interaction, BESS, HVDC and Power-to-X, where control dynamics decide the result.

EMT simulation · sub-synchronous mode · control-loop instability
EMT captures the growing oscillation phasor-domain tools miss — and proves the control fix damps it.
Grid-forming & grid-following converters
BESS, hybrid & Power-to-X plant
MMC-HVDC & classic LCC topologies
PSCAD-native EMT modelling
Encrypted & black-box model handling
Bespoke user-defined components (UDCs)

Evidence packages that pass first time.

Clause-by-clause compliance and submission-ready evidence packs — FRT, voltage and frequency response, reactive capability and model acceptance — built for TSO and network-operator review.

Fault ride-through · LVRT envelope · voltage dip · 140 ms
We demonstrate the plant rides through the dip and stays above the grid-code boundary — and flag the marginal cases.
Clause-by-clause compliance matrix
Fault ride-through (FRT) demonstration
Voltage & frequency response
Reactive capability & voltage control
GB Grid Code · ENA G99 / G98
ENTSO-E NC RfG & NC HVDC · GCC codes

Where a capable plant meets a weak grid.

Weak-grid integration, sub-synchronous oscillation and control-interaction studies — impedance-based screening for resonance and stability risk at low short-circuit ratio, before they show up on site.

Harmonic impedance · resonance scan · parallel resonance × control
We locate the resonance that crosses the converter control bandwidth — then prove the damping filter suppresses it.
Weak-grid / low-SCR integration
Sub-synchronous oscillation (SSO / SSR)
Impedance-based stability screening
Converter control-interaction studies
Harmonic & resonance scans
HVDC point-to-point & multi-terminal

The model is what the TSO actually checks.

Model quality testing, generator and IBR model validation, and RMS-to-EMT consistency — the evidence a connection needs before a TSO will accept the study, with field validation where measurements exist.

Reactive-power step response · model vs reference
We test the model against the reference response and the acceptance tolerance — and flag where an as-submitted model drifts out of band.
Generator model quality testing
IBR / converter model validation
RMS ↔ EMT consistency checks
PowerFactory ↔ PSCAD cross-checks
Field / measurement validation (where available)
Model acceptance evidence packs

When the load is big enough to move the grid.

Connection and integration studies for data centres, electrolysers and large industrial loads — power quality, harmonic risk, energisation, weak-grid connection and interaction with nearby IBR or HVDC assets.

Voltage at point of connection · block-load pickup
We size the connection and mitigation so a block-load pickup holds voltage inside the planning limits — and flag the cases that don't.
Data centres, electrolysers & Power-to-X loads
Large industrial load connections
Power quality & harmonic risk
Energisation & inrush studies
Weak-grid (low-SCR) connection
Interaction with nearby IBR / HVDC
Across the project lifecycle

From first feasibility to post-fault.

Most connection projects need the same studies at different stages. Velon supports the whole arc — early option-screening, the detailed studies that win a connection offer, compliance sign-off, and root-cause analysis when something trips after energisation.

01

Feasibility & optioneering

Pre-feasibility and feasibility studies that test the technical concept, screen connection points and set the functional requirements — the basis for well-founded strategic decisions on large infrastructure.

02

FEED & front-end studies

Front-end engineering design — firming up the connection concept, sizing primary plant and reactive support, and running the studies that de-risk the basis of design before detailed work begins.

03

Connection design & studies

The full study programme — load flow, fault level, RMS, EMT, harmonics, protection — building the validated models that secure the grid-connection offer.

04

Grid-code compliance

National connection requirements reviewed and anticipated; compliance studies delivered, with the system-operator discussion supported through to sign-off.

05

Post-fault & in-service

Transient fault records evaluated and a numerical root-cause analysis carried out — plus proactive studies to drive down the risk of future trips.

The full scope

Every study a connection actually needs.

Beyond the classic study set, Velon focuses on the hard modern problems — complex inverter behaviour, data-centre and large-load interaction, and large-scale wide-area EMT — and on automating these studies so they stay repeatable and auditable. Pick any study to see what it covers; the list is representative of our scope, not its limits.

International power-system support

For key international markets, our engineers identify the applicable connection requirements and anticipate likely future developments — so a project conceived in one jurisdiction is studied against the right code from the start. Velon works across GB, European (ENTSO-E) and Gulf-region requirements.

ENA G99 / G98ENTSO-E NC RfGNC HVDCIEC 60909 · 61000 · 60071IEEE 519 · 1584 · C62.82ER G5/5 · P28 · P29DEWA · TRANSCO · SEC
Who we work with

Built for the hard problems.

TSOsTransmission operatorsCompliance evidence, system studies, model validation at scale.
DNOs / DSOsDistribution operatorsConnection studies and protection where IBR penetration bites.
OEMsManufacturersModel integration, validation and encrypted-model handling.
DevelopersIPPs · BESS · Power-to-XGrid-code studies and submission-ready technical evidence.
Standards & codes we work to
ENA G99 / G98 ENTSO-E NC RfG NC HVDC IEEE 2800 IEC 61400-27 DEWA · TRANSCO · SEC IEEE / IEC harmonics
Beyond the report

When the study repeats, we turn it into a workflow.

Many teams lose time to repeated case setup, spreadsheet result-checking, manual plot extraction and disconnected model versions. Velon can convert repeatable study logic into Python automation, dashboards, model-QA tools and AI-assisted review — with engineers in control of final judgement.

Manual workflow
  • Repeated data entry
  • Disconnected files & versions
  • Manual case setup
  • Slow result review
  • Spreadsheet-driven evidence
  • Version uncertainty
Velon automated workflow
  • Batch scenario generation
  • Automated result extraction
  • Model QA & validation checks
  • Evidence-pack assembly
  • Traceable decision log
  • Engineer review checkpoint

Questions engineers ask us.

What are EMT control-interaction studies, and when are they needed?
Electromagnetic transient (EMT) control-interaction studies examine how the fast inner controls of inverter-based resources (IBR) and HVDC converters interact with one another and with the network at sub-cycle timescales. They become necessary when RMS/phasor models can no longer represent the relevant dynamics — typically on weak grids, in converter-dense areas, or where equipment from several vendors connects close together. The work uses detailed, vendor-specific control models in a time-domain EMT environment such as PSCAD/EMTDC.
How do you screen for subsynchronous resonance (SSR) and converter-driven oscillations?
These are lightly-damped interactions that appear below (or around) the fundamental frequency, often between converter controls and series-compensated or weak networks. We screen for them with impedance-based methods — dq or sequence impedance scans and Nyquist-style stability assessment — and confirm findings with time-domain EMT injection where the screening indicates a risk.
When should a project move from RMS to EMT modelling?
RMS (phasor) studies remain appropriate for most steady-state, load-flow and slower dynamic questions. A move to EMT is warranted when the question involves fast converter controls, harmonic or sub-/super-synchronous interactions, fault ride-through behaviour, or fast fault-current injection — phenomena that RMS models approximate or omit. In practice many projects use RMS for breadth and EMT for the specific cases that govern the result.
How do you coordinate with TSOs and DNOs during a study?
Compliance studies are framed by the connecting network operator's requirements and model-quality expectations. We build and validate models to those requirements, document assumptions and scenarios so the work can be reviewed independently, and prepare evidence in the form the operator expects. Specific submission processes vary by operator and project.
What does a typical study deliver?
Deliverables usually include validated model files, a documented methodology, the scenarios and operating points assessed, result plots, and a written interpretation with engineering recommendations. The exact set depends on the study type and the operator's evidence requirements.

Send the study scope. We'll send a response.

One paragraph is enough to start. We typically come back within two working days.

Brief us

Specialist studies: EMT & grid-code compliance · BESS SSO · RMS→EMT network reduction · Generator EMT

Direct
Skip the form — email the team directly.
consulting@velonenergy.com