NRPillar 03 supporting · Python + DPL

Network Reduction Toolkit.

From a full transmission model to a clean, reduced study model — auditable and re-runnable.

Pillar-3 stability studies need a lean AC/DC model. Velon wraps a commercial solver reduction engine with Python orchestration and DPL scripting — boundary-busbar aware, fully reproducible — feeding directly into PSA, PFA and PVA.

Topology simplificationDPL automationStatic & dynamic equivalentsValidation harness
~5,000 → ~150Buses reduced
< 1 %Boundary-flow error
BatchRe-runnable from config
AuditableEvery reduction logged
The transformation

Thousands of buses in. A faithful study model out.

The full network is collapsed everywhere it does not influence the study zone — while the study area and every boundary busbar are preserved exactly, so results stay defensible.

From full model → reduced study model · boundary-busbar aware
FULL NETWORK · POWERFACTORY ~5,000 buses · too heavy for stochastic sweeps REDUCE PowerFactory DPL + Python REDUCED STUDY MODEL Boundary ABoundary BBoundary CBoundary D STUDY ZONE · RETAINED IN DETAIL boundary = study-zone cut · equivalents preserved ~150 buses · stochastic-ready · faithful at the boundary
Boundary flows still match what the operator publishes — so the reduced-model results are defensible at internal review, interconnection and connection-offer stage.
Watch the automation work

From full scan to study model, one iteration at a time.

Our PowerFactory + Python automation starts at the point of interconnection and expands the retained boundary outward — bus by bus — re-checking the harmonic impedance against the full network at every step. It stops the moment the reduced model matches within the client's threshold, then outputs that study area for EMT.

FULL NETWORK · ~5,000 busesRetained: POI + 1 bus
HARMONIC IMPEDANCE · |Z| vs frequencymatch: 62%
Iteration
1/ 6
Pearson correlationbelow threshold
0.620threshold 0.98

The boundary sits one bus from the POI. Far too tight — the impedance match is poor, so the automation keeps expanding.

Analytical reduction · EMT boundary validation

Analytical Network Reduction
and EMT Boundary Validation.

Large PowerFactory networks often carry more detail than an EMT study needs — but removing the wrong detail corrupts the electrical behaviour seen by the connecting asset. Velon's workflow preconditions the full network, reduces unnecessary modelling detail and validates the reduced study model before PSCAD conversion.

This is not a manual boundary cut. It combines voltage-dip analysis, harmonic-impedance scans, short-circuit checks, power-flow comparison and bottom-up network aggregation to retain the parts of the system that materially affect the POI.

  1. 01

    Full PowerFactory Network

    Start from the full TSO or utility model — transmission, substation and lower-voltage detail where available.

  2. 02

    Analytical Screening

    Voltage-dip and harmonic-impedance scans identify the electrical area that must stay inside the EMT boundary for fidelity.

  3. 03

    Automated Reduction & Validation

    DPL and Python scripts retain the study zone and place validated equivalents beyond it — proven against the full model on power flow, short circuit and frequency scan.

  4. 04

    PRSIM Conversion

    Convert the validated retained study zone from PowerFactory into PSCAD EMT using PRSIM.

  5. 05

    PSCAD EMT Study Model

    The compact EMT model for grid-connection studies, control-interaction, fault ride-through, harmonic performance and dynamic stability.

Preconditioning & bottom-up aggregation

Before defining the EMT boundary, the full network is prepared for reduction. Velon's automation simplifies highly detailed substation models, aggregates feeder-level networks and collapses remote sections into equivalent representations — reducing model size without losing the impedance, short-circuit and voltage-response characteristics that matter at the POI.

The bottom-up approach starts at the lower voltage levels and progressively aggregates upwards. At each stage the reduced representation is checked against electrical indicators — equivalent impedance, short-circuit level and boundary power flow — so the model is made smaller without blindly removing electrically important parts of the system.

Boundary selection indicators

Analytical screen

Voltage dip analysis

Run a three-phase fault at the POI (IEC 60909) and map residual voltages across the wider network. The voltage-depression footprint gives an analytical basis for how far the detailed study zone must extend.

Analytical screen

Harmonic impedance scan

Compare the impedance seen from the POI across the relevant frequency range. The reduced network must retain the key impedance and resonance characteristics of the full network — iterative Thévenin equivalents are accepted only while the spectrum holds.

Full vs reduced · validation

Reduced model validation tests.

Every reduction is proven against the full model on four electrical fronts before it is allowed forward to PRSIM conversion.

01

Power-flow match

Active and reactive flows compared between the full and reduced PowerFactory models — confirming the operating point and boundary flows are preserved.

02

Short-circuit level match

Short-circuit levels compared at selected busbars — especially the POI and nearby asset connection points — confirming the grid strength seen by the asset is preserved.

03

Frequency-scan match

Harmonic impedance and network frequency-scan results compared at the POI — confirming resonance and impedance characteristics are retained before EMT conversion.

04

Voltage-dip heatmap

The POI fault study is re-run and the residual-voltage footprint compared — confirming the retained zone is large enough and the fault response is represented correctly.

Validation report generated

The automation produces an auditable comparison report: power-flow deviation, short-circuit deviation at selected buses, impedance-scan deviation across frequency, and voltage-dip propagation. The report is the technical basis for the selected EMT boundary — and confirms whether the reduced model is suitable for PRSIM conversion into PSCAD.

  • 0.4%P / Q flow deviation
  • 0.8%SCL deviation · POI
  • ±1.2%|Z| scan · to 2.5 kHz
  • PASSdip footprint match